site logo

ALASE VS. BERNICE (2005)

case summary

Court of Appeal (Lagos Division)

Before Their Lordships:

  • James Ogenyi Ogebe JCA
  • Dalhatu Adamu JCA
  • Suleiman Galadima JCA

Parties:

Appellants:

  • Olatunde Ayotunde Alase
  • Akinwande Olusegun Akinwunmi
  • Patience Ayoola Olabinjo
  • David Olatunji Fakoya
  • Ademola Aderemi Oshunniyi
  • Florence Yetunde Olakanmi
  • Anthony Olusoji Beckley

Respondents:

  • Olufunke Bernice Olusegun
  • Olasunkanmi Dada
  • Sanusi A. Bashua
  • S. A. Eshubi
  • N. A. Kekere-Ekun
  • Abu Amore N. Adisa Bashua
  • R. A. Adewale
Suit number: CA/L/90/2002

Background

This appeal arises from a suit initially filed in the High Court of Lagos State concerning a lease agreement from June 19, 1970...

Facts of the Case

The 1st and 2nd respondents (plaintiffs) sought specific performance against the 3rd to 8th respondents (defendants) over a lease that was never executed. The appellants, as trustees of St. Mark Church of Christ, applied to be joined as defendants...

Issues

The central issues in this case include:

  1. Whether the issue of identity of the land in dispute was adequately raised during pleadings and at trial.
  2. Can a Judge set aside a consent judgment entered by a previous Judge in the same case?

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court emphasized that...

Court Findings

The Court ruled that the issue of land identity is fundamental and must be proven with mathematical accuracy. The previous consent judgment was not deemed final.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to the failure to establish the grounds of appeal adequately.

Significance

This case highlights the rigorous standards for proving land title and the importance of procedural adherence in civil appeals.

Judgment Date

2005-05-23

Suits Number

CA/L/90/2002

Litigants

John Doe (Appellant) vs. State (Respondent)

Citation

[2005] All FWLR Alase vs. Bernice 27

Judges

James Ogenyi Ogebe, Dalhatu Adamu, Suleiman Galadima

Chief G. O. Shotayo-Aro represented the Appellants, while Chief A. Adekoya acted for the 1st and 2nd Respondents. S. A. Bashua represented the 3rd - 8th Defendants/Respondents.

Summary

In Alase vs. Bernice, the Court of Appeal reaffirmed key principles regarding the identification of land titles in disputes, emphasizing the necessity for mathematical accuracy and the complexity of consent judgments.

Outcome

The appeal was conclusively dismissed with costs awarded against the appellants.