site logo
Skip to case content
Case Digest

ALESHE V. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2016)

Court of Appeal, Ibadan Division

Coram
  • H.S. Tsammani JCA (Presided and Read the Lead Judgment)
  • Obietonbara Daniel-Kalio JCA
  • Anyerem Okoronkwo JCA
Parties

Appellant:

  • Ayodeji Aleshe

Respondent:

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria
Suit number
CA/IB/203/2015
Delivered on

Background

This case revolves around Ayodeji Aleshe, who was implicated in a conspiracy involving significant financial improprieties while working at the First Bank of Nigeria, alongside employees from the Central Bank of Nigeria. Aleshe was charged with multiple counts related to the Advanced Fee Fraud Act and other financial crimes, leading to a bail application being dismissed by the Federal High Court.

Issues

Several key issues were raised on appeal, including:

  1. Was the refusal of bail justified?
  2. Did the trial judge apply section 162 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 (ACJA) correctly?
  3. Could an untested extra-judicial statement be utilized to deny bail?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision, holding that the trial judge exercised their discretion judiciously and in accordance with established legal principles regarding bail.

Court Findings

The court noted that considerable factors must be considered in bail applications, such as:

  • The severity and nature of the charges.
  • Strength of evidence against the applicant.
  • Punishments prescribed for the alleged offenses.
  • Likelihood of committing further offenses or evading trial.
The evidence presented against Aleshe was significant, including accusations of serious economic crimes and substantial financial losses, which warranted the denial of bail.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, agreeing that the trial judge was not wrong to have denied Aleshe's bail application based on strong evidence and the gravity of the charges.

Significance

This case adds to the body of Nigerian law regarding bail applications, emphasizing the balance between the constitutional presumption of innocence and the need to safeguard the integrity of the judicial process in serious criminal cases.

This ruling not only clarifies the parameters around bail after arraignment but also reinforces that the right to personal liberty is not absolute when weighed against societal interests and the seriousness of criminal allegations.

Counsel

Counsel:

  • Oluwaseyi B. Alabi Esq. for the Appellant
  • Shola Obaribirin Esq. for the Respondent