Background
This case originated from a petition filed by the respondents challenging the electoral victory of Sani Ibrahim Ahmed, the 2nd appellant, in the Kano State House of Assembly election held on May 3, 2003. The respondents contended that Ahmed was not qualified to run for election due to being below the required age of 30 years as stipulated in section 106(b) of the 1999 Constitution. The election tribunal agreed and ordered a bye-election, leading to this appeal.
Issues
The Court of Appeal addressed two central issues:
- Whether the evidence supported the claim that the 2nd appellant was below 30 years at the time of the election.
- Whether the tribunal had the jurisdiction to adjudicate on pre-election issues related to the qualification of candidates.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the tribunal possessed the necessary jurisdiction to consider post-election complaints regarding a candidate's qualification, as defined in the Electoral Act and Constitution. Furthermore, it established that the evidence presented was sufficient to conclude that the 2nd appellant was below the requisite age at the time of the election.
Court Findings
The Court found that:
- The evidence from the petitioner’s schools and the certified true copy of Ahmed’s birth certificate suggested he was born on January 15, 1975, while the appellant's father provided a different birth certificate stating January 15, 1973.
- The tribunal had a duty to evaluate the credibility of witnesses and assign weight to the evidence properly presented; in this case, the tribunal rightly found the evidence of the appellant’s father incredible.
Conclusion
The appeal by the ANPP was dismissed, affirming the tribunal’s decision based on the sufficient evidence demonstrated that Ahmed had not achieved the age of 30 at the time of the election, thus confirming his disqualification.
Significance
This case is significant as it reaffirms the importance of age requirements for electoral candidates under Nigerian law, emphasizing the jurisdictional boundaries of electoral tribunals and their role in adjudicating on matters related to candidates' eligibility. It sets a precedent on how evidence must be evaluated regarding age determinations in election petitions.