ALL PROGRESSIVES CONGRESS (APC) V. KENNETH O. ASEKOMHE (2020 (2020)

CASE SUMMARY

Court of Appeal Benin Division

Before Their Lordships:

  • H. M. Ogunwumiju JCA
  • Samuel Chukwudumebi Oseji JCA
  • Moore Aseimo Abraham Adumein JCA (Dissenting)

Suit number: CA/B/128/2020

Delivered on: 2020-06-18

Parties:

Appellant:

  • All Progressives Congress (APC)

Respondents:

  • Kenneth O. Asekomhe
  • Matthew Aigbuhuenze Iduoriyekemwen
  • Adams Aliyu Oshiomhole
  • Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
  • Inspector General of Police

Background

This case emanated from an appeal against a ruling by the Federal High Court, Benin Division, delivered on June 8, 2020. The appellant, the All Progressives Congress (APC), was challenging the mode of selecting its gubernatorial candidate for the Edo State elections slated for September 19, 2020. The 1st and 2nd respondents initiated the action, asserting that a directive to adopt direct primaries issued by the National Working Committee was unconstitutional as it had not been approved by the National Executive Committee.

Issues

The case revolved around several key issues:

  1. Whether the court’s order was made without the requisite hearing of motions related to its jurisdiction.
  2. The competency of the appellant's appeal as it was filed without the necessary leave.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that:

  1. An issue for determination in an appeal must derive from the grounds of appeal presented. In this case, the appeal was competent as it related to the trial court’s handling of jurisdiction.
  2. The trial court erred in making a restraining order regarding the party's primaries, particularly without a proper hearing on the jurisdiction question.

Court Findings

The court’s findings demonstrated several important points:

  1. It found that the trial court’s order effectively determined key aspects of the case without resolving preliminary objections regarding its jurisdiction.
  2. The preservation order issued by the trial court limiting the APC’s ability to proceed with its primaries was deemed improper as the court had not sufficiently established a basis for that decision.

Conclusion

The appeal was allowed, reversing the previous orders from the trial court, which had effectively unduly restricted the APC's electoral process without a thorough examination of the jurisdictional issues at hand.

Significance

This case highlights the critical balancing act between the judiciary's role in electoral matters and the need to preserve political processes. It underscores the courts' obligation to ensure fair hearing and uphold democratic principles while also navigating statutory frameworks governing primary elections.

Counsel:

  • Chief H. O. Ogbodu SAN - for the Appellant
  • A.I. Osarenkhoe Esq. (with him, Ken Mozia SAN) - for the 1st & 2nd Respondents
  • I.O. Odubela SAN (with him, Roland Otaru SAN; Robert Emukpoero Esq., Oladipo Osinowo and Akinola Oyebanjo Esq.) - for the 3rd Respondent
  • Mrs. V.O. Owolabi - for the 4th Respondent
  • Omosun M.O. - for the 5th Respondent