site logo
Skip to case content
Case Digest

BASSEY OKPA V. THE STATE (2017)

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Coram
  • Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen CJN
  • M. Dattijo Muhammad JSC
  • K. Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun JSC
  • Ejembo Eko JSC
  • Sidi Dauda Bage JSC
Parties

Appellant:

  • Bassey Okpa

Respondent:

  • The State
Suit number
SC.413/2013
Delivered on

Background

This case revolves around the appeal of Bassey Okpa, a police officer, who was convicted of the murder of Efa Ephraim. On April 23, 2009, Okpa, during a routine police patrol in Calabar, shot at a vehicle carrying Ephraim and his friends after they had been stopped for inspection. Ephraim was hit and subsequently died. The appellant claimed the gun discharged accidentally.

Issues

The primary issues examined by the Supreme Court included:

  1. Whether the trial court correctly evaluated the appellant's defense of accident.
  2. The appropriateness of the charge against Okpa, particularly concerning his conviction under the penal section of the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that:

  1. It is within the trial court’s purview to assess witnesses and evidence. The appellate court should not interfere with such evaluations unless they are shown to be perverse.
  2. A conviction can stand even if based on a seemingly incorrect legal provision, provided that the facts establish an offense.

Court Findings

The court thoroughly analyzed statutory provisions, including sections of the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Law:

  • The court reaffirmed that the evaluation of evidence is the duty of the trial court and noted that the trial court found Okpa’s account implausible.
  • Regarding the defense of accident, it was determined that the circumstances surrounding the shooting did not support Okpa’s claim of an accidental discharge.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court dismissed Okpa's appeal, finding no merit in his arguments. The court upheld the lower courts' convictions, reaffirming the necessity of credibility in witness testimonies and the evaluation of evidence.

Significance

This case is significant as it portrays the stringent standards of proof required for a successful defense in murder cases and emphasizes the authority of a trial court in evaluating witness credibility and evidence. It further clarifies that convictions can be upheld irrespective of the specific legal provisions cited, as long as the underlying facts establish a recognized offense.

Counsel:

  • Samuel N. Agweh - for the Appellant
  • Godwin Omoaka (with him, Solomon Babajide) - for the Respondent