Skip to case content
Case Digest

BUSARI V. OSUN STATE WATER CORPORATION (2008)

Court of Appeal (Ibadan Division)

Coram
  • Kumai B. Akaahs JCA
  • Musa Dattijo Muhammad JCA
  • Amina Adamu Augie JCA
Parties

Appellant:

  • Rasheed Busari

Respondents:

  • Osun State Water Corporation
  • The Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Osun State
Suit number
CA/I/35/2006
Delivered on

Background

The plaintiff, Rasheed Busari, was employed as a motorcycle mechanic by the Oyo State Water Corporation in 1978. When Osun State was created, he was transferred to the Osun State Water Corporation, eventually rising to the position of senior technical assistant. He was suspended in 1998 following allegations of theft of company property, which led to criminal charges, but he was ultimately discharged and acquitted. Despite this outcome, his employment was terminated on 27th November 2000 without following the proper procedures outlined in the relevant statutory regulations.

Issues

The appeal centered around three primary issues:

  1. Whether the plaintiff's employment had statutory flavor and if the termination complied with the required statutory procedures.
  2. Whether the reasons for the termination were adequately proven in the lower court.
  3. Whether the termination was valid based on the notice provided.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal, led by Justice Kumai B. Akaahs, found that:

  1. The Public Officers Protection Act applies only in legal proceedings between States, thus not applicable in this case. The trial court had erred in relying on it.
  2. The plaintiff’s suspension related directly to the allegations made against him, and due process under the Civil Service Regulations had to be followed for his termination.
  3. Being a public servant with statutory flavor, his termination could not occur without compliance with statutory procedures.

Court Findings

The court emphasized several key points in its decision:

  1. Procedural validity in employment termination, especially for contracts with statutory flavor, must be strictly adhered to.
  2. No sufficient evidence was presented that established the termination was executed by the appropriate authority.
  3. The principle stating that a willing servant cannot be forced upon an unwilling master does not apply to employees with statutory protections.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the Court of Appeal allowed Busari's appeal, overturning the lower court's ruling. The judgment decreed that the termination of Busari's employment was illegal, unconstitutional, and void, thereby reinstating him as a senior technical assistant and awarding him all due salaries from the date of termination.

Significance

This case highlights the importance of adhering to statutory procedures in employment matters involving public officers in Nigeria. It emphasizes the fact that employment contracts with statutory flavor cannot be terminated without following due process, which upholds employee rights against arbitrary dismissal.

Counsel:

  • M.O. Agboola - Counsel for Appellant
  • Respondents - Absent and Unrepresented