site logo

DAKAN V. ASALU (2015)

case summary

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Before Their Lordships:

  • John Afolabi Fabiyi JSC (Presided)
  • Clara Bata Ogunbiyi JSC
  • Kudirat M.O. Kekere-Ekun JSC
  • John Inyang Okoro JSC
  • Chima Centus Nweze JSC

Parties:

Appellants:

  • Fatai Sule Dakan
  • Sunday Bankole
  • Simeon Oyebi
  • Momodu Agbaje
  • Sanusi Opaleye
  • Saula Anibire
  • Ganiyu Salami Agbaje

Respondents:

  • Alhaji Lasisi Asalu
  • Hassan Taiwo Anjorin
  • Musediku Akinboyede
Suit number: SC/64/2005Delivered on: 2015-05-15

Background

This case arose from a land dispute involving the respondents and the appellants regarding a property located at Osi Quarters, Otta, Ogun State. The respondents, representing the Osolo Royal Family, sought declaratory and injunctive reliefs against the appellants but were unsuccessful in the High Court. Following a dismissal of their appeal by the Court of Appeal for want of diligent prosecution, the respondents’ attempts to reinstate their appeal led to the Supreme Court.

Issues

The main issues considered by the Supreme Court included:

  1. Whether the Court of Appeal was correct to extend the time for filing briefs and allow for additional grounds of appeal after having dismissed the case for lack of prosecution.
  2. Understanding the appropriate timing for opposing such applications in the context of a dismissed case.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that:

  1. An appeal dismissed for the failure to file the appellant’s brief is deemed final and cannot be resuscitated.
  2. The lower court erred in permitting the respondents to file additional grounds of appeal post-dismissal, as its jurisdiction had been nullified.

Court Findings

The court affirmed the doctrine of stare decisis, noting the lower court’s failure to adhere to established jurisprudence regarding the finality of appellate dismissals. The respondents' attempts to argue additional grounds or seek extensions were deemed futile as the underlying appeal had no legal standing.

Conclusion

The appeal was allowed, with the Supreme Court setting aside the ruling of the Court of Appeal dated December 3, 2002, granting an extension for filing briefs and allowing additional grounds of appeal. The court reinforced the doctrine that once a matter is dismissed, it cannot be rekindled.

Significance

This decision underscores the importance of procedural diligence in appellate practice. The ruling clarifies that appellate courts maintain limited jurisdiction to revisit dismissed appeals, thereby fortifying the rule of law and court efficiency by discouraging stale or indolent claims.

Counsel:

  • Chief O.T. Adebiyi - for the Appellants
  • O.J. Bamgbose - for the Respondents