Skip to case content
Case Digest

DAMJOR VS. ATTN.-GEN., BENUE STATE (2001)

Court of Appeal (Jos Division)

Coram
  • Ibrahim Tanko Mohd
  • Oludade Oladapo Obadina
  • Isa Abubakar Mangaji
Parties

Appellants:

  • Jacob I. Damjor
  • Others

Respondents:

  • Attorney-General, Benue State
  • Others
Suit number
CA/J/130/97
Delivered on

Background

This case involves an appeal from the decision of the High Court of Benue State, where Jacob I. Damjor, the appellant, sought to challenge a ruling that struck out his suit against the second respondent, Benue State Local Government, due to a lack of mandatory statutory notice of intention to sue as required by Section 178(1) of the Benue State Edict, No. 14 of 1976.

Issues

The main issues for determination in this case include:

  1. Whether the trial judge was correct in striking out the case against the second respondent due to the absence of a statutory notice.
  2. Whether the committee’s failure to record oral answers from the appellants constituted a violation of their right to fair hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the failure to serve the mandatory pre-action notice rendered the action incompetent, thereby denying the court jurisdiction to hear the case against the second respondent. Furthermore, it asserted that the irregularity from the committee's failure to record the appellants' explanations did not breach the principles of natural justice.

Court Findings

The court made several important findings:

  1. The requirement for a pre-action notice under Section 178(1) is a condition precedent, making non-compliance a critical jurisdictional defect.
  2. The committee's procedural inadequacies, including the non-recording of the appellants' responses, did not infringe upon their right to fair hearing.
  3. There was no indication that the appellants' defense was ignored, as the committee considered other substantive evidence in reaching its conclusions.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellants' appeal based on the findings above, affirming the trial court's decision. The court emphasized the critical nature of adhering to procedural requirements for claims against local governments, underscoring that failure to follow such procedures undermines a court's jurisdiction.

Significance

This case underscores the importance of statutory compliance in legal proceedings against local governments in Nigeria. It reiterates the necessity for appellants to ensure adherence to procedural obligations, particularly the requirement of pre-action notice, and clarifies the boundaries concerning fair hearing rights during administrative investigations.

Counsel:

  • L. E. Agbo, Esq. - for the Appellants
  • V. Y. Boor-Sanusi (Ag. Director of Civil Litigations, Benue State) - for the Respondents