site logo
Skip to case content
Case Digest

FEDERAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, OKENE V. OGBONNA (2007)

Court of Appeal (Abuja Division)

Coram
  • Olufunmilola O. Adekeye JCA (Presided)
  • Mary U. Peter-Odili JCA
  • Abdu Aboki JCA (Lead Judgment)
Parties

Appellants:

  • Federal College of Education, Okene Governing Council
  • National Commission for Colleges of Education
  • Federal Ministry of Education

Respondents:

  • Mrs. Irene Adana Ogbonna
  • Mallam Salawudeen A.A. Adajine
  • Mr. Samuel I. Adejumo
  • Mrs. Ebun Mary Adejumo
  • Miss Christy H.S. Adeiza
  • Mrs. Temitope M. Simeon
  • Mrs. Alice F. Abodurin
  • Mr. Samuel Ogirima
  • Mrs. Fatima Idachaba
Suit number
CA/A/36/2006
Delivered on

Background

This appeal arises from the judgment of the Kogi State High Court delivered on 28th February 2005, which ruled in favor of the plaintiffs (respondents) challenging the termination of their appointments by the Federal College of Education, Okene. The plaintiffs claimed that their employment, which was permanent and pensionable, was wrongfully terminated by the first defendant without just cause and demanded reinstatement and damages totaling N1,464,457.00k.

Issues

The key issues for determination are:

  1. Whether the Kogi State High Court had the jurisdiction to entertain the case.
  2. The propriety of the termination of plaintiffs’ appointments.
  3. Whether the plaintiffs effectively proved their claim for damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the Kogi State High Court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the matter because the claims involved a breach of contract of employment with an agency of the Federal Government, which exclusively falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court as per the Constitution of Nigeria.

Court Findings

The court found that:

  1. The trial court erred in asserting jurisdiction under the proviso of section 251 of the 1999 Constitution.
  2. Because the defendants are actions of the Federal Government, Section 251 mandates that only the Federal High Court can adjudicate such matters.
  3. The plaintiffs’ claims, being based on the termination of employment, pertain to administrative actions of the Federal Government, therefore excluding the jurisdiction of the State High Court.

Conclusion

The appeal succeeded, and the judgment of the Kogi State High Court was set aside. The Court of Appeal emphasized that any proceedings conducted without jurisdiction are null and void.

Significance

This ruling underscores the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal High Court over disputes involving the Federal Government and its agencies, reinforcing the distinction between Federal and State High Court jurisdictions under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. The decision serves as a precedent to clarify the scope of jurisdiction concerning administrative and executive decisions involving federal entities.

Counsel:

  • A.M. Aliyu (for Appellants)
  • Jibo Ibrahim (for Respondents)