site logo

IMARUAGHERU V. AIGUOKUNRUEGHIAN (2021)

case summary

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Before Their Lordships:

  • Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili JSC (Presiding)
  • John Inyang Okoro JSC
  • Helen Moronkeji Ogunwumiju JSC (Lead Judgment)
  • Abdu Aboki JSC
  • Adamu Jauro JSC

Parties:

Appellants:

  • Osaboro William Imaruagheru
  • Obarogie Imaruagheru

Respondent:

  • Taiwo Alegbesogie Iginineweka Ogedegebe, Probate Registrar, High Court of Justice, Benin City
Suit number: SC.1076/2016

Background

The case concerns a dispute over the inheritance of a property located at No. 32 (formerly No. 28) Agbado Street, Benin City, Edo State. The appellants, Osaboro William Imaruagheru and Obarogie Imaruagheru, are the children of Pa Imaruagheru Evbowe, the deceased owner of the property. The dispute arose after a Will was made by the deceased, which bequeathed the property to his eldest son, Aiguokunrueghian, who had passed away prior to the conclusion of traditional burial rites, a customary requirement in Bini tradition. The appellants contested the validity of the Will, arguing that their deceased brother’s inability to perform the rites voided his claim to the Igiogbe, thereby entitling them to the property.

Issues

The primary legal questions considered by the court were:

  1. Whether the appellants were entitled to inherit the Igiogbe due to the failure of Aiguokunhueghia to perform the final burial rites.
  2. Whether the adjoining land was part of the Igiogbe or could be separately devised under Bini customary law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that:

  1. The Igiogbe is traditionally inherited by the eldest surviving son of a deceased Bini man who satisfactorily performs the final burial rites.
  2. A Testator has the right to devise other properties separately from the Igiogbe.

Court Findings

The Supreme Court found that:

  1. The appellants were not entitled to the Igiogbe as their brother had not completed the necessary burial rites before his death.
  2. The adjoining land was specifically devised to Aiguokunhueghia and remained his property despite his failure to perform the rites.

Conclusion

The appeal was dismissed due to a lack of merit, with the court underscoring the distinct nature of the Igiogbe and the adjoining land based on the testamentary language used by the deceased. The court validated the Testator's right to dictate the distribution of his properties.

Significance

This case is significant as it clarifies the application of Bini customary law regarding the inheritance of the Igiogbe and sets a legal precedent concerning the validity of testamentary dispositions under customary practices. It reaffirms the importance of performing traditional burial rites in the context of property inheritance in Bini culture.

Loading recommendations...
Loading sidebar...