site logo

INCORPORATED TRUSTEES OF LIVING FAITH CHURCH V. AYODEJI (2022)

case summary

Court of Appeal (Ibadan Division)

Before Their Lordships:

  • Said Tanko Hussaini JCA (Presided)
  • Mohammed Danjuma JCA
  • Abba Bello Mohammed JCA

Parties:

Appellants:

  • Incorporated Trustees of Living Faith Church (a.k.a. Winners Chapel)
  • Chief Taoreed Tunde Dada
  • Mr. Taofik Musa
  • Mr. Taiwo L. Falohun
  • Alhaji Monsuru Oseni

Respondent:

  • Colonel Victoria Omolara Ayodeji
Suit number: CA/IB/102/2017Delivered on: 2022-07-01

Background

This case arises from an action filed by Colonel Victoria Omolara Ayodeji against the Incorporated Trustees of Living Faith Church, along with several other defendants. The respondent sought an interlocutory injunction to prevent the first appellant from interfering with a disputed piece of land. The trial court granted the injunction without ensuring that all defendants, particularly the 2nd-5th appellants, were present or had been notified of the proceedings.

Issues

Central to this appeal is the issue of whether the trial proceedings adhered to the principle of fair hearing, as enshrined in Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. This includes specific inquiries into:

  1. The service of notice and processes to all parties.
  2. The implications of not allowing the defendants to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the trial court violated the fair hearing rights of the 2nd-5th appellants by not serving them with necessary court documents and failing to afford them an opportunity to present their case.

Court Findings

  • The failure to serve the 2nd-5th appellants with the originating processes constituted a violation of their fair hearing rights, making the trial court's decision on the interlocutory injunction a nullity.
  • The principle of audi alteram partem, which mandates that all parties must be heard, was breached.
  • The lack of jurisdiction of the trial court deeply affected the validity of its ruling.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the trial court’s ruling for lack of jurisdiction. The court recognized that the non-compliance with due process as mandated by law necessitated the nullification of the previous decisions made by the trial court.

Significance

This case is significant as it reinforces the fundamental principles of fair hearing within the Nigerian legal system. It highlights the consequences of non-service of court processes and underscores the necessity of allowing all parties an opportunity to present their case, thereby ensuring justice is not only done, but seen to be done.

Counsel:

  • Dr. J. O. Mbamalu - for the 2nd - 5th Appellants
  • Oludare A. Adesanya, Esq. - for the Respondent