site logo
Skip to case content
Case Digest

INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION V. CHIEF GODWIN EN (2017)

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Coram
  • Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen JSC
  • Musa Dattijo Muhammad JSC
  • Kudirat M. Kekere-Ekun JSC
  • Ejembi Eko JSC
  • Sidi Dauda Bage JSC
Parties

Appellant:

  • Independent National Electoral Commission

Respondents:

  • Chief Godwin Enasito
  • Chief John Akaruayen Ewenede
  • Barrister Jonah Ijomone
  • Chief Samuel Buluku
  • Chief Vincent Oduaran
Suit number
SC.705/2015
Delivered on

Background

This case involves the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and several local politicians who challenged the suppression of the Ughelli South State Constituency by INEC in 1998. The respondents claimed that the Delta State House of Assembly was improperly constituted due to the suppression of their constituency, which had been lawfully created.

Issues

The case raised several key legal issues:

  1. Whether INEC was protected under Section 2(a) of the Public Officers Protection Act.
  2. If the Court of Appeal was correct in deciding that the respondents were not required to request the National Assembly to restore the constituency.
  3. Whether reliance on the judgment of Oju Local Government v. INEC was appropriate.
  4. Whether the probative value assigned to certain exhibits regarding the constituency’s existence was warranted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court concluded that:

  • Continuance of injury refers to the legal injury itself, rather than its ongoing effects.
  • Because the action against INEC was filed 15 years after the act (the suppression), it was statute-barred.

Court Findings

The court found that:

  • The respondents had not sufficiently proven a continuance of legal injury that would allow their action to bypass the statute of limitations.
  • The actions taken by INEC were completed in 1998, and subsequent elections did not constitute an ongoing injury.
  • Thus, the suit was statute-barred as it was not filed within 3 months of the act as prescribed by law.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court allowed INEC's appeal, reversed the lower court's ruling, and struck out the respondents' suit as being statute-barred. The court reinforced that the essence of limitation laws is to ensure timely prosecution of legal actions to avoid stale claims and ensure justice.

Significance

This case is significant as it emphasizes the importance of the statute of limitations in protecting public officers from prolonged legal challenges, and clarifies the legal criteria for determining whether a cause of action is considered timely or stale under Nigerian law.

Counsel

Counsel:

  • S. O. Ibrahim
  • E. L. Akpofure SAN