site logo
Skip to case content
Case Digest

NEWBREED ORGANISATION LTD. V. J. E. ERHOMOSELE (2006)

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Coram
  • Salihu Modibbo Alfa Belgore JSC (Presided)
  • Akintola Olufemi Ejiwunmi JSC
  • Ignatius Chukwudi Pats-Acholonu JSC
  • Aloma Mariam Mukhtar JSC (Read the Lead Judgment)
  • Ikechi Francis Ogbuagu JSC
Parties

Appellant:

  • Newbreed Organisation Ltd.

Respondent:

  • J. E. Erhomosele
Suit number
SC.212/2001
Delivered on

Background

This case addresses a defamation claim made by J. E. Erhomosele (the respondent) against Newbreed Organisation Ltd. (the appellant) regarding a publication in the "President Magazine" that led to the termination of Erhomosele's employment. The respondent alleged that the publication falsely attributed statements to him, causing significant damage to his reputation and financial loss.

Issues

The Supreme Court considered the following key issues:

  1. Whether the Court of Appeal was correct in affirming the trial court's decision in favor of Erhomosele despite a lack of evidence of malicious falsehood.
  2. Whether the Court of Appeal's reduction of the awarded damages from N300,000 to N150,000 was justified, given the absence of supporting evidence for loss.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized that for a claim of defamation to succeed, the plaintiff must prove the falsity of the statements made, their malicious nature, and provide evidence of the resulting harm. In instances where the defendant fails to present a case, the plaintiff's unrefuted evidence stands as sufficient proof.

Court Findings

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's findings, determining:

  1. Erhomosele provided credible uncontradicted evidence establishing that no chat occurred, thus proving the published statements were untrue.
  2. The refusal of the appellant to retract the publication constituted evidence of malice.
  3. The court found the initial award of damages excessive, but maintained the principle that some compensation was due for the respondent's unemployment due to defamatory actions.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the appeal by Newbreed Organisation Ltd. was dismissed, affirming the judgment of the Court of Appeal, with the damages reduced to N150,000, acknowledging the reputational harm sustained by Erhomosele.

Significance

This case illustrates the principles surrounding defamation and malicious falsehood in Nigerian law, particularly the burden of proof required from both parties. It highlights the importance of a defendant's obligation to provide evidence in defense of claims made against them and the court's discretion in awarding damages based on the evidence of loss presented.

Counsel:

  • Mr. Fred Agbaje for the Respondent