Skip to case content
Case Digest

OBARO V. PROBATE REGISTRAR (2001)

Court of Appeal (Lagos Division)

Coram
  • Atinuke Omobonike Ige, JCA (Presiding)
  • Suleiman Galadima, JCA
  • Amiru Sanusi, JCA (Lead Judgment)
Parties

Appellant:

  • Mrs. Eunice Obaro

Respondents:

  • Probate Registrar
  • Mr. Omoruyi Alonge
  • Mrs. Omolara Ayanru
  • Mrs. Edowaye Afadama
  • Mrs. Yemisi Akinrinade
  • Mr. Oghogho Ayo Alonge
  • Miss. Uyigue Alonge
  • Mrs. Imade-Ize-Iyamu
  • Miss Agharese Alonge
Suit number
CA/L/283/99
Delivered on

Background

The case involves Mrs. Eunice Obaro’s attempt to gain an interim order for managing her deceased father’s estate following his death on September 21, 1998. Mrs. Obaro applied for the appointment of a receiver to oversee the collection of rents from her father’s numerous properties, many of which were located in various cities, including London and Ibadan. However, the key contention arose from the fact that her father had not yet been buried, which is a significant aspect of Bini customary law.

Issues

The main issues presented in this case are:

  1. Whether the appellant has locus standi to initiate proceedings concerning her father’s estate prior to the completion of the second burial ceremony.
  2. Whether the trial court was correct in striking out the appellant's originating summons, deeming it incompetent under Bini customary law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that under Bini customary law, no action can be undertaken regarding a deceased person’s estate, including litigation, until the second burial has occurred. Therefore, by filing the action before this burial, the appellant violated established customary laws, leading to the conclusion that she lacked standing to pursue the case.

Court Findings

The court evaluated the appellant's claims against the backdrop of Bini customary law and referenced prior cases that supported the necessity of performing burial rites before any legal actions regarding an estate could proceed. The ruling underscored that:

  1. The second burial must be performed before any estate administration can legally commence.
  2. The trial court acted appropriately in dismissing the appellant's case based on the absence of such a burial.

Conclusion

The appeal was ultimately dismissed as the court confirmed that the actions taken by the appellant were premature under Bini customary law. The ruling emphasized the binding nature of such customs in legal proceedings concerning estate matters.

Significance

This case is significant as it reinforces the importance of customary laws in Nigeria's legal framework, particularly in matters relating to inheritance and estate administration. It highlights the necessity for parties to conform to traditional rites and customs before engaging in legal actions concerning estates, thereby ensuring adherence to cultural values and legal expectations.

Counsel:

  • Mr. S. Asemota, SAN
  • Mr. T. Alasa
  • Mr. A. O. Eghobnmien (Jnr.)