site logo

OMOKARO V. OMOKARO (2021)

case summary

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Before Their Lordships:

  • Musa Dattijo Muhammad JSC
  • Chima Centus Nweze JSC
  • Helen Moronkeji Ogunwumiju JSC
  • Abdu Aboki JSC
  • Tijjani Abubakar JSC

Parties:

Appellants:

  • Mr. Omorogieva Omokaro
  • Monday Omakaro
  • Aghamiohgho Omokaro
  • Mrs. Erunmwonosere Omokaro
  • Osamudiamen Omokaro

Respondents:

  • Mr. Nosakhare Omokaro
  • Mrs. Onaiwu Omokaro
  • Mr. Donald Omokaro
  • Aisagbonbuomwan Omokaro
  • Mrs. Omorowa Obarisiagbon (nee Omokaro)
  • Mrs. Christy Adams
Suit number: SC.359/2016Delivered on: 2021-04-16

Background

This case pertains to a dispute among the heirs of the late Pa Lawrence Omokaro regarding the inheritance of his property located at No. 4, Omokaro Street, off Upper Mission Road, Benin City. The 1st respondent, Mr. Nosakhare Omokaro, claimed his rights as the eldest son to inherit the property known as the ‘Igiogbe’ according to Bini customary law which accords him rights following the completion of the burial rites of his father. He asserted that the house and all adjoining vacant land should belong to him as part of the Igiogbe.

Issues

The case presented two primary issues for determination:

  1. Whether the justices of the Court of Appeal erred in including the adjacent vacant land as part of the Igiogbe.
  2. Whether the trial court disregarded Exhibit C, the deed of transfer vesting title of the vacant land to the appellants in its judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court upheld the concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts, indicating that the evidence presented did not support the appellants' claims and that the customary law regarding inheritance was followed appropriately.

Court Findings

The court identified clear violations of Bini customary law in the will made by the late Pa Lawrence Omokaro. According to the findings:

  1. The eldest son does not inherit until after the final burial rites, confirming Mr. Nosakhare's right upon completion of these rites.
  2. The Igiogbe encompasses the property at No. 4 Omokaro Street, including the undeveloped plot, as they are intertwined and not separately defined as the appellants contended.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the 1st respondent, affirming that the entire property should rightfully belong to him as the Igiogbe, dismissing the claims made by the appellants and declaring the clauses in the will as incompetent due to the inconsistency with Bini customary law.

Significance

This case underscores the inviolable nature of rights established under customary law, particularly concerning inheritance practices among the Bini people, setting a precedent for similar cases and delineating the limitations of testamentary disposition under these laws.

Counsel:

  • P.O. Osemwenkha, Esq. (for Appellant)
  • Kassim Oshiobogie (for 1st Respondent)
  • A.O. Edeki, Esq. (for 2nd to 6th Respondents)