site logo

PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY V. ALHAJI HAMZA KOSHE AKUYAM (2024)

case summary

Court of Appeal (Abuja Division)

Before Their Lordships:

  • Muhammed L. Shuaibu JCA
  • Hannatu Azumi Laja-Balogun JCA
  • Jane Esienanwan Inyang JCA

Parties:

Appellant:

  • Alhaji Hamza Koshe Akuyam

Respondents:

  • Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)
  • The Speaker, House of Representatives
  • Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
  • All Progressives Congress (APC)
Suit number: CA/ABJ/CV/527/2022

Background

This case revolves around the appeal of Alhaji Hamza Koshe Akuyam (the appellant), a member of the National Assembly sponsored by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Following a resignation from the PDP, he was accused of defecting to the All Progressives Congress (APC), sparking legal actions from the PDP and other respondents to declare his seat in the National Assembly vacant.

Issues

The principal issues raised were:

  1. The correctness of the trial judge’s ruling on the appellant’s resignation and alleged defection.
  2. The trial judge's failure to apply the established precedent regarding the difference between resignation and defection.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing that the automatic loss of seat upon defection, as per Section 68(1)(g) of the Nigerian Constitution, was applicable since the appellant resigned from the party that sponsored his election.

Court Findings

In its determination, the court made several significant observations:

  1. The act of defection was defined as a transition from one political party to another, while resignation indicated relinquishing membership without necessarily crossing over to another party.
  2. Newspaper publications regarding the appellant's alleged defection were not sufficient evidence to prove his change in political allegiance.
  3. Despite the appellant's resignation from the PDP, he did not have the right to retain his seat since no division or merger that would allow him to remain was established.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the court concluded that the appellant, having resigned from the PDP, fell under the provisions of the Constitution mandating that he vacate his seat in the National Assembly. The claim against him was valid, and the court found no merit in the appeal challenging the lower court's ruling.

Significance

This case underscores the strict interpretation of electoral laws regarding party allegiance and the implications of resignation from political parties on legislative membership. It reinforces the legal principle that a member’s political party membership directly correlates with their eligibility to serve in the National Assembly.

Counsel:

  • J. J. Usman, SAN
  • Isaac Anumuda
PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY V. ALHAJI HAMZA KOSHE AKUYAM (2024) | Nigerian Case Law