site logo

SALEH V. ABAH (2018)

case summary

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Before Their Lordships:

  • Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili JSC
  • Clara Bata Ogunbiyi JSC
  • Chima Centus Nweze JSC
  • Amina Adamu Augie JSC
  • Sidi Dauda Bage JSC (Lead Judgment)

Parties:

Appellant:

  • Hon. Hassan Anthony Saleh

Respondents:

  • Christian Adabah Abah
  • People’s Democratic Party (PDP)
  • Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
Suit number: SC.144/2016

Background

This case revolves around an election dispute involving the 2011 and 2015 elections in Nigeria. Hon. Hassan Anthony Saleh, the appellant, contested against Christian Adabah Abah, the 1st respondent, in the primary elections for the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) seeking nomination for the House of Representatives from Ado, Okpokwu and Ogbadibo Federal Constituency of Benue State. The court had to address the issue of whether the 1st respondent had been disqualified from contesting due to the submission of a forged certificate to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Issues

The important issues addressed in this case include:

  1. Whether the trial court found facts regarding certificate forgery by the 1st respondent.
  2. Whether based on that finding, the 1st respondent was disqualified from contesting the 2015 elections.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that:

  1. A failure to appeal against a factual finding in a case renders that finding binding on the parties.
  2. The question of a candidate’s presentation of a forged certificate is significant regardless of the timing of the alleged act.
  3. Past findings of forgery by an appropriate tribunal must be regarded in determining current eligibility for election.

Court Findings

The Supreme Court found that:

  1. The 1st respondent had previously submitted a forged certificate in the 2011 election.
  2. The constitution explicitly states that any candidate who has ever presented a forged certificate is disqualified from being elected.
  3. No requirement exists that the candidate be charged, tried, or convicted for the act of forgery before being disqualified from future elections.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the decision of the lower court, and upheld the trial court’s judgment declaring the election of the 1st respondent null and void due to certificate forgery.

Significance

This ruling reinforces the principle that any candidate found to have presented forged documents is disqualified from contesting elections, emphasizing the integrity of electoral processes in Nigeria. The decision aims to deter electoral fraud and promote accountability among political candidates.

Counsel:

  • Dr. Alex A. Izinyon (SAN)
  • S.I. Ameh (SAN)
Loading recommendations...
Loading sidebar...