Skip to case content
Case Digest

UMERIEH V. APGA (2021)

Supreme Court of Nigeria

Coram
  • Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili JSC
  • Musa Dattijo Muhammad JSC
  • Kumai Bayang Akaahs JSC
  • Ejembi Eko JSC (Lead Judgment)
  • Uwani Musa Abba-Aji JSC
Parties

Appellant:

  • Gilbert N. Umerieh Comrade Thankgod Anagor

Respondents:

  • All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA)
  • Mr. John Nwokoye
  • Mr. George Udedibia
  • Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
Suit number
SC.974/2019
Delivered on

Background

The case of Umerieh v. All Progressives Grand Alliance revolves around a pre-election dispute concerning the nomination of candidates for the Anambra State House of Assembly.

Facts and Procedural History

The appellants claimed that the 1st respondent’s primaries for the Awka-North Constituency were postponed and yet the 2nd respondent was declared the winner without proper procedures being followed. Following their unsuccessful challenge at the Federal High Court, they appealed to the Court of Appeal, which upheld the trial court's decision. The appellants subsequently escalated the matter to the Supreme Court.

Issues

The key issues before the Court were:

  1. Whether the lower court erred in ruling that the appellants’ cause of action was statute barred according to section 285(9) of the 1999 Constitution.
  2. Whether the appropriate dates for determining the accrual of the cause of action were correctly considered.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the decision of the lower courts. The court held that, according to section 285(9) of the Constitution, pre-election matters must be filed within 14 days of the action being challenged. The appellants failed to do so, as their suit was filed 32 days after the event they sought to challenge.

Court Findings

The court thoroughly examined the timeline of events:

  1. The cause of action accrued on 5 October 2018, when the contested Certificate of Return was issued.
  2. The appellants filed their suit on 5 November 2018, which was beyond the one-month limit stipulated in the Constitution.
  3. Consequently, both the trial court and the Court of Appeal correctly determined that the suit was statute barred.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's affirmation of the lower courts’ decisions reflected a stringent adherence to statutory time limits for election-related disputes, emphasizing the necessity for timely legal challenges in electoral matters.

Significance

This case underscores the importance of following procedural rules established in electoral law, specifically regarding time constraints for filing claims. It serves as a pivotal reference for future pre-election disputes in Nigeria, asserting strong enforcement of the 14-day filing requirement alongside the judiciary's role in ensuring that electoral integrity is maintained by ruling out late challenges.

Counsel

Counsel:

  • John C. Okoli, Esq. (for the Appellants)
  • S. I. Ezeokenwa, Esq. (for 1st Respondent)
  • Obunneme Ezeonwu, Esq. (for 2nd Respondent)
  • Dr. C. B. Anyigbo (for 3rd Respondent)