site logo
Skip to case content
Case Digest

UNION BANK OF NIGERIA PLC & ORS V. DAVID LABORATORIES LTD & (2013)

Court of Appeal (Owerri Division)

Coram
  • Uwani Musa Abba Aji JCA
  • John Inyang Okoro JCA
  • Haruna Simon Tsammani JCA
Parties

Appellants:

  • Union Bank of Nigeria PLC
  • Chief Chibuzor N. Ziggy Azike, KSC
  • Commissioner of Police, Imo State

Respondent:

  • David Laboratories Ltd
Suit number
CA/PH/34M/2005
Delivered on

Background

This case concerns an appeal against the ruling of the Federal High Court regarding the appointment of a receiver by Union Bank of Nigeria over the assets of David Laboratories Ltd. The dispute originated from a loan default leading to the appointment of a second defendant as receiver, which the respondent challenged on several grounds.

Issues

The court examined key issues related to:

  1. The validity of the appointment of the receiver and its impact on the powers of the company’s directors.
  2. Jurisdiction issues concerning the competence of the suit brought by the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court clarified that once a receiver is appointed under Section 393(4) of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 1990, the powers of the company’s directors over the assets come to an end. The determination of jurisdiction must hinge on the reliefs sought in the plaintiff’s claim.

Court Findings

The court found that:

  1. Issues of competence and jurisdiction are interconnected. An action without jurisdiction is rendered null.
  2. A preliminary objection based on jurisdiction should reflect only the claims in the statement of claim without introducing external affidavit evidence.
  3. The absence of a counter-affidavit from the respondent strengthened the appellant's position regarding the appointment of the receiver.

Conclusion

The appeal was dismissed as the lower court's ruling was affirmed, reinforcing the decision regarding the lack of merit in the arguments against the receiver's appointment.

Significance

This ruling clarified essential elements about the powers of receivers under corporate law, particularly in the context of financial disputes, and reinforced the principles guiding jurisdiction and competence in legal proceedings.

Judgement Date

21 June 2013

Keywords

Receiver appointment, jurisdiction, Companies and Allied Matters Act, Court of Appeal, company law.

Counsel:

  • I. A. Akaraie, Esq. - for the Appellants
  • P. O. Ori, Esq., P. A. Ucheoma (Mrs) - for the Respondent