Appellate court duty not to reopen factual issues

Related decisions

• IDIOM VS. STATE (2004)→

  Court

  Court of Appeal (Calabar Division)

  Judgment date

  15 March 2004

  Summary of Idiok v. State (2004) which addresses issues of admissibility of extra-judicial statements in appellate courts.

  #

  Related keywords

  Explore connected topics

  8

  • Affidavit evidence→
  • admissibility of extra-judicial statements→
  • admission of additional evidence on appeal→
  • appellate court duty not to reopen factual issues→
  • appellate court jurisdiction→
  • criminal appellate procedure→
  • evidence act sections 86 and 87→
  • sufficient foundation for interlocutory application→