Armed robbery under section 329(2) of the criminal code law of bayelsa state

Related decisions

• ZIBUR V. STATE (2021)→

  Court

  Court of Appeal (Port Harcourt Division)

  Judgment date

  17 July 2020

  A summary of the Court of Appeal's decision in Zibur v. The State focuses on the assessment of accomplice testimony and identification procedures.

  #

  Related keywords

  Explore connected topics

  11

  • Identification evidence→
  • Identification parade→
  • Proof beyond reasonable doubt→
  • accomplice evidence→
  • admissibility and use of extra-judicial statements→
  • armed robbery under section 329(2) of the criminal code law of bayelsa state→
  • co-accused’s confessional statement→
  • conspiracy to commit felony under section 444(a) of the criminal code law→