Counsel’s address not a substitute for evidence

Related decisions

• CITIZENS INTERNATIONAL BANK LTD V. SCOA NIGERIA LTD (2006)→

  Court

  Court of Appeal (Lagos Division)

  Judgment date

  6 April 2006

  A detailed summary of the case Citizens International Bank Ltd v. SCOA Nigeria Ltd, focusing on the issues of evidence admissibility and garnishee orders.

  #

  Related keywords

  Explore connected topics

  13

  • Affidavit evidence→
  • Garnishee proceedings→
  • conflicting and parallel affidavits→
  • counsel’s address not a substitute for evidence→
  • evidence act 1990, section 136→
  • evidence act 1990, section 149(d)→
  • evidence act 1990, sections 86–89→
  • fair hearing and miscarriage of justice→

• SIDDIQ JAURO BAYO V. DON DAJ HALILU NJIDDA & ORS. (2004)→

  Court

  Court of Appeal (Jos Division)

  Judgment date

  2 February 2004

  Summary of the court decision in the case of Siddiq Jauro Bayo v. Don Daj Halilu Njidda & Ors, focusing on election qualification and bye-election orders.

  #

  Related keywords

  Explore connected topics

  17

  • 1999 constitution sections 106, 107, 285 and 318→
  • Election tribunal jurisdiction→
  • adamawa state house of assembly election→
  • appellate re-evaluation of evidence→
  • candidate educational qualification→
  • consequential order for bye-election→
  • counsel’s address not a substitute for evidence→
  • electoral act 2002 sections 134 and 136→