Federal high court (civil procedure) rules 2000, order 7 rule 8

Related decisions

• FAMFA OIL LTD. VS. ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION (2003)→

  Court

  Supreme Court of Nigeria

  Judgment date

  17 October 2003

  A detailed exploration of Famfa Oil Ltd. vs. Attorney-General of the Federation, focusing on procedural irregularities and their implications in court. Read for

  #

  Related keywords

  Explore connected topics

  13

  • Burden of proof→
  • Miscarriage of justice→
  • Non-compliance with Rules of Court→
  • Originating summons→
  • Procedural irregularity→
  • curable irregularity→
  • federal high court (civil procedure) rules 2000, order 3 rule 1→
  • federal high court (civil procedure) rules 2000, order 7 rule 8→

• NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION V. FEMFA OIL LIMITED (2002)→

  Court

  Court of Appeal, Abuja Division

  Judgment date

  25 April 2002

  Summary of the significant court ruling in Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation v. Femfa Oil Limited, addressing jurisdiction and procedural compliance.

  #

  Related keywords

  Explore connected topics

  11

  • Appellate review of findings of fact→
  • Originating summons→
  • action initiated by due process of law→
  • arguments of counsel cannot substitute for evidence→
  • burden of proof in civil proceedings→
  • evidence act 1990, sections 135(1) and 136→
  • federal high court (civil procedure) rules 2000, order 7 rule 8→
  • judicial signature as condition for issuance of originating summons→